She looks really good, but in my opinion it's a bit too much.
Like you I am not surprised that it got so much attention.xoxoLenyaFashionDreams&Lifestyle
It's a bit trashy...the underboob and the side of her tummy? it's just too much all at once...Lisa.
I think her age has little to do with it. She's got a great figure, but IMO, it looks more like something bedroom-y than red carpet.
I'm more shocked by the quality of the zipper/dress back construction! Horrible! ;-)
Maybe if it covered her whole boob it wouldn't be to bad.
Oh, come on, Maitland. You knew what you was doing...and it worked! Everyone's now talking about it.She looks fantastic, but the dress is too see through for anyone (no matter your age). This "dress" just reeks of bad taste. She's really a gorgeous woman and didn't need to wear something like this to get attention.
*were doing (not "was doing"...LOL!)
I'm not going to say she shouldn't wear what she wants, but it's a bit much. I think she should just not be surprised that people are talking about it.
There's a time and a place for an outfit like that... the red carpet is not one of them.
this just look too citchy!
Love the poster in the background the dude is screaming and it probably "Noooooooooo don't do!" Poorly taste, beautiful women don't have to resort to sleaze & bad taste.
It's because she's 37. A 19 year old would be getting just as much attention but in a positive way. It's the age that people would disapprove of. I have no idea who this actress is nor do I like her dress, something that wouldn't look good on anyone imo. But let's be honest, it's wearing it at her age that people are finding jarring
I'm just so over all of this exposure (literal exposure!). It hurts my heart and ticks me off that after all women have gone through to be seen as more than sex objects, we've regressed more than ever and then try to call it freedom. Men, in general, don't feel the need to "embrace their sexuality" through overtly racy dressing or by flaunting a lot of skin. Why do we? Great topic! I haven't been commenting much lately, but rest assured I'm still checking in on you! Peace! Serene
I'm not surprised this outfit garnered so much attention. The media still loves to make a big deal out of the amount of cloth folks, especially women, wear in the public eye. She has a great body and looks terrific here. Why not sport such a dress if she wants to?♥ Jessica
If I had her looks, I would...probably not wear that because I would fall on my ass and expose it to the world. But still. We live in a society that uses sex to sell EVERYTHING, but are grossed out by reveling dresses. Oy! She looks amazeballs, rock on!
LOL I highly doubt she is surprised it garnered attention. More like she would have been surprised had it not. Seriously she has an amazing rocking body. I wish I had her body at 37. I think the back zipper looks horrid though. Cheap looking. Mind you, no one else is looking at the zipper! Ha!Good for her and her PR I say. Any publicity is good publicity. bisousSuzanne
Hmmm...when it looks like you're not wearing panties, it will always raise more than an eyebrow. But she looks damn good!
The pose in front of the poster is hilarious. The dress kind of reminds me of those screen printed skirts that were popular in Japan a few years ago.http://snopes.com/photos/risque/skirts.asp
I think anytime there's pelvic bone and side boob in one outfit people will notice. I don't think it's unflattering or tawdry. It looks fine, but it's definitely provocative by many people's standards.
She has a nice body but I just think it lacks class or sophistication!
I concur with Kezzie. Much too trashy a dress for someone so pretty.
I am not surprised it got attention :)
I think this veers into "trashy" territory! I'm pretty sure she knew the kind of attention it would give her when she picked out this dress.-SharonThe Tiny Heart Starbucks Giveaway!